inception-movie-poster-5682722This is not my usual review format, I simply want to list a few things that bother me about this movie. Inception is a film I really didn’t want to write about because my opinion seems to be in the vast minority. However, after all the 5 star reviews are scrolled past, I found on IMDB and on Yahoo! Movies that there are many folks out there agreeing with me. Inception is a smokescreen of deceptive marketing and not much more.

To borrow David Spade’s SNL satire: I saw Inception last weekend. I liked it better the first time as The Matrix. (audience laughs). That’s basically my beef. This movie is harder to untangle than a wet mass of kite string. The worst part is that it follows no rational premise. It is a long film at 148 min. Unfortunately none of that time is spent developing characters or a plot of any logical substance. By placing the movie in a dream, anything can be done and anything can be said. Nothing can be challenged because it’s got neat cgi once in a long while. Believe me, they make you wait for it. The best part? They leave it open for a sequel. What will be new in it, a beach and some dreams of atv racing? Not a good movie experience for me, I recommend you go see Despicable Me instead.

3 Replies to “Inception”

  1. Pingback: Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-08-01
  2. And all that not even to mention all the ideas that Nolan got from a Japanese animation “Paprika” for this film, and its soundtrack is the exact Piaf’s “No, Je ne regrette rien” song in slow-motion…near-zero originality.

    1. Oh wow. Those are such great factoids, thank you! Here I thought I just had an offbeat dislike of it. It sure was popular with the masses! Didn’t work for me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *