The House That Jack Built

The House That Jack Built – Note: This is my full walkthrough & film summary of this graphic horror movie. Not for everyone. If you are into horror, have a listen 🙂 I recorded this back in 2018 when I was exploring a “Full Walkthrough” approach to movies on the podcast.

mv5bndq4y2e5odktodi5zs00zgvkltgyztetnwy1zjniztfjote3xkeyxkfqcgdeqxvyody3nzc0otk-_v1_sy1000_sx675_al_-7937512-7452508-6490603

My rough notes (Only included for bots and meta functionality): The director and buildup 2 levels: the incidents of a serial killer / the walk to hell, escorted by the verge It’s weird because we are in jack’s head but not supposed to relate with him, and yet we may. Ocd etc are relatable things Mr. Verge (Demon) and Jack 1st incident – Uma Thurman’s character is a bit demanding/annoying. She insults him by saying he looks like a serial killer. She gives him tips in jest on how to transport and bury bodies. She’s demanding about having him drive her back. She pushes and pushes, apparently as a joke, about how he is a serial killer. He is being very cruel with her, sarcastic. She STILL gets in a car with him. Then she says she takes it all back, saying he’s way too much of a wimp to be a serial killer. He kills her. As an engineer, Jack sees the act of killing as an engineered art. We see the pencils straight as a sign of his OCD. The walk-in freezer. He bought a retired restaurant freezer. Pizzas included. Put her body in there with the others. 2nd Incident – Door to door killing. Trying to get in. The wolf. The Kirby salesman. She agrees to let him in after much consternation. Once in, he says ridiculous things, almost playing with the situation, proving his ability to kill. Gets her to put a pillow under her head. Pretends to cry apologizing, gives her tea w poison. She still doesn’t die. Gets knife out, counts up the ribs, pierces her heart. Takes a photo of her with a little antique camera. Drags the body out – so much work to this art. Cleans up with bleach it looks like. He is haunted by the idea he left blood at the scene so he goes back to clean again. The OCD coming out. Even with an alarm on full blast, he recalls one place there might be blood and goes back yet again! Sees a police car, pulls the dead body out of the van. Cops come up to his van. Gives the cop another smooth story. This guy is good. Starts demanding the room be inspected. He is so sure of himself. Ties the body to the van. The drive causes her face to be ground down. Grisly sight. “I went to great lengths to fake normal empathy in order to confound the masses. The scythes are beautiful, peaceful. Cutting off the duckling’s foot is grisly, sad, repulsive. The strangling scenes are awful but in truth, probably as bad as this film gets for gore. This film raises the question: what is hell to jack? Preferred the dark negative light “demonic.” Jack had no family. 3rd incident The family shooting. 4th incident “I had a romance” He says he had stronger feelings for Riley Keough’s character than a psychopath is supposed to have. Jack meets Jacqueline (Riley Keough), a woman that he calls “Simple,” as he believes her to be stupid. Jack confesses he has killed sixty people at this point and is the serial killer “Mr. Sophistication,” but Jacqueline does not believe him and thinks he’s lying. She tries to get away and tell a cop, but he dismisses her as a drunk. Eventually, Jacqueline fails to escape and Jack cuts off her breasts with a knife and murders her. He pins one of the breasts to the Cop’s car and fashions the other one into a wallet. 5th Incident[edit] Jack has detained six people and tied them to a makeshift post, lining their heads up in a row with the intention of killing them all with one bullet, but he realizes that the bullet he bought from Al (Jeremy Davies) is not a full metal jacket bullet. Al refuses to sell the bullets and instead Jack has to go to the trailer of a man known as S.P. (David Bailie). Knowing that the cops are looking for Jack, S.P. points a gun at Jack and thinks that he has caught him. Jack convinces him to drop his gun and kills him with a knife through his throat and then grabs the one bullet he needs. He then puts on S.P.’s red bathrobe and waits for the police to arrive as his van is now stuck in a ditch and he requires transportation. He kills the cop and steals his car, which he leaves outside his freezer space with the siren blazing. He tries to line up the shot but realizes it’s too blurry. He finally succeeds in prying open a door at the back of the freezer that’s always been stuck shut. He continues to try to line up the shot and sees Verge for the first time. Verge suggests that Jack has unfinished business and has never really built the house that he was intending to build. Using the bodies as material, Jack constructs a house out of them and when he enters the make-shift house, he sees a hole that leads down. At this point, the cops successfully torch through the door, and Jack decides to go through the hole, following Verge. Epilogue: Katabasis[edit] In a clear allusion to Dante’s Inferno, Verge is actually the poet Virgil and is guiding Jack through Hell. At the very bottom of Hell there is a bridge and a vast dark space below. The door on the other side of the bridge leads out of Hell and presumably to Heaven as Verge tells Jack. The bridge is completely broken, but Jack notices that one could climb around the cliff and over to the other side, although Verge tells him that he recommends against it and that this is not where he is to deliver him. Jack ignores him and decides to try to climb over anyway. Jack fails and falls off the cliff down into the abyss with the flowing fire below.

The Invisible Man, 2020 – ★★★

499085-the-invisible-man-0-500-0-750-crop-9956563

Elizabeth Moss is getting to be a force to reckon with in Hollywood. I’ve loved her stuff for years, the earliest I recall being “The One I Love” with Mark Duplass. That’s a crazy sci-fi movie too though nothing on the gigantic scale of Leigh Whannell’s “The Invisible Man.” I liked Moss in this and that’s what made the over 2 hours palatable. Unfortunately the cool stuff was saved until the end and anything else awesome was glittered few and far between.

The story has nothing to do with the 1933 classic version other than the man’s last name. It waits over half the film to show anything “invisible.” Moss’ expressive eyes keep us happy but hungry on the journey. When the shit goes down it’s pretty fun but not amazing. I really have no more to say about this film. It’s a fun ride but nothing like what it could have been.

I was hoping for a scoundrel out doing mischievous acts. Instead we have an invisible stalker messing with his woman for no apparent reason other than the fact that she has the balls to disagree with him (?) Leigh Whannell could have done much better in the screenplay chair. I must dissent from the masses on this one. You could miss this one. 6/10

Satan’s Little Helper (2004)

An offbeat B-movie with a smokin’ hot babe, a somewhat recognizable star and the devil himself. This is the first film I got to watch for my new writing gig at HorrorNews.net Ok now I will just say it: Katheryn Winnick, if we ever meet around town, would you consider signing my ____ in Sharpie? You are a goddess.

mv5bnwnhnzcxogutnjkyny00ztuzltg3ymqtnmqwnzmymzzkzwiyxkeyxkfqcgdeqxvyntayodkwoq-_v1_sy1000_cr007011000_al_-2565390-4360678-2846570
mv5bndblztdkywutymfkzc00mdi2lwfhnmutmzyyztkwztu2nwi3xkeyxkfqcgdeqxvymjuyndk2odc-_v1_-1024x576-8040363-3790557-9131228

Psycho 2 5/10

I will respect any movie with the Psycho name attached … up to a point. The movie should be connected to the original in cohesive ways and this one is not.

mv5bzdnhmthin2qtzwvlos00nzq3lwe2y2ityjmxyjbmy2exndnlxkeyxkfqcgdeqxvymtqxnzmzndi-_v1_sy1000_cr006441000_al_-2631899

For starters, Norman Bates is released from the insane asylum after demonstrating his sanity. That wouldn’t just happen. Second he is released back to all the old triggers including the hotel. No psychiatrist on the case would allow that.

At his job (he looks and acts very wooden in the film) he meets Meg Tilly’s character and they hit it off. This also feels forced and unrealistic. This film could have been so great! I haven’t yet seen III so perhaps they got closer to Hitchcock in their conventions. II looks like a cheap TV movie or lampoon on the original. When someone is murdered it’s serious but not so in this film universe. The sheriff gives a knowing laugh when recalling Norman’s story. There was no verisimilitude, it was not entertaining in the least. Worst of all, none of it was logical. 5/10

The Super

The Super is pretty super but not super duper a ghost I know says. There’s some great creepy footage in this film. An old building is a great setting to build creepiness into suspense. As is with most mysteries, things are not as they seem. I’ll leave it up to you to decide if you like how they look when the mystery is revealed. There’s pros and cons for me. Regardless, it’s a dark, foreboding horror/thriller/mystery that keeps you guess all the way through. Discovering the answer may be more difficult for some rather than others. It’s a good one though and I think this film delivers based on its popularity score on IMDb.

mv5bntayyzi0zjutodqwzs00mtyxlthjotmty2rjzte0odk0mgjjxkeyxkfqcgdeqxvynjk1otk0mg-_v1_sy1000_sx675_al_-1296171
The Super (2017)
R | 1h 30min | Horror , Thriller | 19 October 2018 (USA)
A man becomes the superintendent of a large New York City apartment building where people mysteriously go missing.
Director: Stephan Rick
Writer: John J. McLaughlin
Stars: Patrick John Flueger, Val Kilmer, Louisa Krause

Director Stephan Rick has done a lot of stuff in German. The one I recognize the most in his bio is “The Good Neighbor” which I have not yet seen but want to.

This film focuses on intruders and peeping toms inside your home. There are some great shots that pan down hallways and enter into clickety clack unlocked doors. It’s an average film, not amazing but the scares that takes place in the apartments are truly creepy. Kilmer is great as always. His voodoo obsessed character isn’t the only supe though so keep that in mind. I think the story takes an odd turn but then again, most the film consists of small and large turns throughout the runtime. I might have preferred a straight ahead story without so many twists that focused on the creepy nature of others having access to ones private living space. It isn’t that at all. It’s much more convoluted than that but on some level, I found it very fun and spooky. I can’t tell you why really or it would spoil the plot. Have you seen it? Let’s talk about it in the comments. I welcome spoilers there.

The Strangers: Prey at Night

I thought it looked cheesy when the tagline was “Let Us Prey.” and derivative but SOMETHING WAS TELLING ME ABOUT STRANGERS 2.

This film is now as of writing this review streaming on Prime Video

I saw the big guys’ low scores but SOMETHING WAS TELLING ME ABOUT STRANGERS 2
It came and went with a whimper in cinema SOMETHING WAS TELLING ME ABOUT STRANGERS 2
And that something was right!

mv5bmty1otiwodgzmv5bml5banbnxkftztgwmzuymdgzndm-_v1_sy1000_cr006741000_al_-3315755
The Strangers: Prey at Night (2018) R | 1h 25min | Horror | 9 March 2018 (USA) A family of four staying at a secluded mobile home park for the night are stalked and then hunted by three masked psychopaths. Director: Johannes Roberts Writers: Bryan Bertino, Ben Ketai Stars: Christina Hendricks, Martin Henderson, Bailee Madison

Our director here is Johannes Roberts, the director also of “47 Meters Down.” While that is a far from perfect movie, it works as shark horror/suspense and it takes creative chances all over the place.I found it to be one of my favorites last year. The director shows himself to be simple as well, I like that a lot.

I’ve given you the synopsis as always so I’ll skip the pleasantries. I loved the dark look of this film. I loved the idea of being isolated, which each victim is at one point or another. Being face to face literally a foot away from your killer is another amazing visual. Oh and let us not forget the ideal usage of the masks and the axe.

Finally, I liked the element of the victims going into fight or flight or panic attacks. When the brother is using the phone his hand is violently shaking. That’s how it would be. I don’t know about you but I get sick and tired of perfect heroes in horror who seem to know just what to do with their crossbow etc. This is real, it’s way more scary.

After getting through the first 1/4 of the film, I loved every minute thereafter. I’m not sure how necessary that first 1/4 was. I give the film a 9/10.

Diabolique (1955)

diabolique-1200-1200-675-675-crop-000000-768x432-4769941
An abused, neglected wife and her husband’s jaded mistress plot the perfect murder.



The biggest pat on the back for this film goes to the writers. The way the characters are developed turns the screw of intensity until finally the ending is revealed. If you haven’t seen it, let me say it is not like other endings, it is a magnificent one, set apart.

Many writers were involved in starting and completing this film. After the final scenes’ power, you will likely agree with me it shows! The director is Henri-Georges Clouzot. He is known for other intensely dark yet compelling thrillers like this one. The films he has done as listed in his IMDB bio are: “Le Corbeau and “The Wages of Fear.” I admit to not seeing these films, but I want to after seeing “Les Diabolique.” He is compared in the bio to Hitchcock except with films that “do not have as much light relief.”

Le Corbeau got Georges in a lot of trouble. The French government thought he presented France in a dark and bad light so he was banned from making films for several years. Though there are many other stories about this director, I feel that one is the most telling about his honesty and integrity as a filmmaker. Thank goodness I don’t live in a censored state like he did. I don’t think I would be able to stand for it. Inevitably, this made him tough and thoughtful about his craft.

diabolique-1955-6256818
The brutal scene pictured here is a good followup to the director who crafted this amazing film. By today’s standards, it’s tame but for 1955 it was more brutal & mysterious than Hitchcock and that’s why people still love it to this day.

This film takes place in a French boys’ school where most the characters work. The Headmaster has been cheating on his wife for years and his mistress as well as the wife, work at the school. This is where the story is told and the exquisite tension begins.

You see a far different school than ours in America today. The teachers are smoking in the presence of the students, the kids food fight regularly, although it is smart how they just don’t feed them for the malfeasance. It seems to be ameliorated the next day. Funny what a schoolmaster hunger can be right? The headmaster is a womanizer, a rapist (in theory), and an all around unlikable guy. We start to see right away he needs to be killed, or at least we hope. As the two women drive together, they discuss a plan to get rid of this guy once and for all. For all intents and purposes, it seems like a perfect plan for murder.

I want to make a comment about the practical effects. Obviously back then it was all they had to work with but they are so much fun to watch. I recently watched “Eyes Without a Face,” another classic horror, and the car scenes were so funny to me. It looks so fake and yet they probably thought it was so real for the time. The scenes in these cars are even more archaic and also more funny to me. It really shows how far we’ve come with effects. Now back to the idea of this plot, with no spoilers.

The film is black and white of course and filmed almost entirely at the house which is the school for boys. The swimming pool that is part of their plan is at the school. They do a great job distracting the viewer with activities of the children. We find that the husband/headmaster has a lot to lose if his wife divorces him. He hits her and treats her miserably. As the viewer it’s hard to not imagine killing him, he’s that bad. BUT as we all know in the civilized world, it’s never appropriate to kill someone. We watch these two women make their plans, as he equally humiliates the mistress though not as badly, and their path takes them to another location: a holiday hotel.

The little couple that manage the hotel are side-splittingly funny. They are innocents and it’s funny how people intending to kill can look at innocents with such jealousy. Once the deed is done, there’ll be no going back.

I’ll leave my summary there for you. I haven’t given anything away except the fact that there is a great ending. I would challenge you to be brave and watch this old film. It’s better than so many modern murder mysteries.  If you’ve seen it, do leave some thoughts in the comments. I enjoy discussing this and other murder mysteries in this genre. Thos eare my thoughts, what did you think of this film?